|
University of North Carolina
at Asheville Register for: |
|
|
|
|
| Title | "The Land of Sky: A Summary of the Population and Economy of the Metropolitan Asheville" |
| Alt. Title | "The Land of the Sky" |
| Identifier |
http://toto.lib.unca.edu/findingaids/mss/housing_authority_city_asheville/series_26 _publications/land_of_sky/default_haca_land_of_sky.htm |
| Creator | Metropolitan Planning Board of the City of Asheville and Buncombe County |
| Alt Creator | |
| Subject Keyword | Asheville, NC ; city planning ; civic improvement ; Department of Housing and Urban Development ; economy ; Housing Act of 1954 ; Housing Authority of the City of Asheville ; industry ; manufacturing ; metropolitan area ; Metropolitan Planning Board of the City of Asheville and Buncombe County ; modernization ; revitalization ; urban planning ; Urban Planning Assistance Program ; urban renewal ; Urban Renewal Administration ; Western North Carolina ; |
| Subject LCSH |
City planning -- North Carolina --
Asheville
City planning -- United States -- Asheville (N.C.) Asheville (N.C.) -- Planning Civic improvement -- North Carolina -- Asheville Community development, Urban -- United States -- Case studies Urban policy – North Carolina – Asheville Urban renewal -- North Carolina -- Asheville Asheville (N.C.) -- Urban renewal Urban renewal -- United States -- Case studies Housing -- North Carolina -- Asheville Metropolitan Area -- Statistics Industries -- North Carolina -- Asheville Asheville (N.C.) -- Economic conditions Asheville (N.C.) -- Economic conditions -- 20th century Asheville (N.C.) -- History |
| Date | 1966 |
| Publisher | Housing Authority of the City of Asheville |
| Contributor |
Metropolitan Planning Board of the City of Asheville and Buncombe County |
| Type | text ; illustrations |
| Format | Book 8 1/2" x 11" |
| Source | D. H. Ramsey Library Special Collections, Manuscript Collections M2007.12.126 |
| Language | English |
| Relation | Is part of: Asheville Model City Records, Special Collections, D.H. Ramsey Library, UNCA ; Housing Authority of the City of Asheville ..., D. H. Ramsey Library, Special Collections, UNCA. |
| Coverage | 1966: Asheville, N.C. |
| Rights | Any display, publication or public use
must credit D. H. Ramsey Library, Special Collections, University of
North Carolina at Asheville. Copyright retained by the authors of certain items in the collection, or their descendants, as stipulated by United States copyright law. |
| Donor | Donor 310 ; City of Asheville, NC. |
| Description |
This publication is a brief summary of a lengthy technical report prepared by the Metropolitan Planning Board of the City of Asheville and Buncombe County (that longer report is titled “A Population and Economic Analysis of the Asheville Metropolitan Area and the Western North Carolina Region that it Serves”). The report compares Asheville and, to a lesser extent, Western North Carolina, to other metropolitan areas in the state, and to North Carolina as a whole. The report found that Asheville and Western North Carolina seriously lagged behind other areas of the state, and the authors suggested multiple ways to improve the economy, industry, education, tourism, and appeal of the area. Housing and the general built environment were particularly criticized. The report states, “The quality of housing in the City of Asheville, Metropolitan Asheville and Western North Carolina is below that of urban places in North Carolina…Almost 50 percent of the dwelling units in Western North Carolina, approximately 41 percent in Metropolitan Asheville, and approximately 30 percent in the City of Asheville were substandard in 1959.” The citizens and leadership of Asheville were encouraged to “endeavor to do all that is humanly and financially possible to renovate, revitalize, and modernize the downtown area.” |
| Acquisition | 2007- |
| Citation | Housing Authority of the City of Asheville Records, "The Land of the Sky," D. H. Ramsey Library, Special Collections, University of North Carolina at Asheville |
| Processed by | Special Collections staff 2008 |
| Last update | 2008-04-28 |
| CONTEXT | |
| PAGE | DESCRIPTION | THUMBNAIL | ||||||||||||||||
| The Land of the Sky- FULL TEXT | ||||||||||||||||||
| cover |
THE LAND OF THE SKY A SUMMARY OF THE POPULATION AND ECONOMY OF METROPOLITAN ASHEVILLE |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| inside cover |
THE PREPARATION OF THIS REPORT WAS FINANCIALLY AIDED THROUGH A FEDERAL
GRANT FROM THE URBAN RENEWAL ADMINISTRATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, UNDER THE URBAN PLANNING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
AUTHORIZED BY SECTION 7O1 OF THE HOUSING ACT OF 1954, AS AMENDED. MAY, 1966 |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
|
A POPULATION AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE ASHEVILLE METROPOLITAN AREA AND THE WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA REGION THAT IT SERVES This report is a digest based on a lengthy technical report prepared by the Metropolitan Planning Board of the City of Asheville and Buncombe County entitled "A Population and Economic Analysis of the Asheville Metropolitan Area and the Western North Carolina Region that it Serves." Included is a brief summary of the findings of this technical report and the conclusions and recommendations resulting therefrom. Since this summary is by necessity brief and concise, the detailed data necessary to support many of the conclusions and recommendations can be found only in the larger technical report, copies of which are available at the Western North Carolina Regional Planning Commission for $5.00. |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
| 1
haca_land_of_sky |
SUMMARY Setting and Description Metropolitan Asheville is strategically located within 24 hours of 60 percent of the Nation's population by rail or highway, 4 hours by air, and is nearly equidistant from New York, Chicago, St. Louis, New Orleans, and Jacksonville. Metropolitan Asheville is part of a large fertile plateau lying between the Blue Ridge |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 2 |
and Great Smoky Mountains. Due to its geographical location, it serves
as the natural regional service center for the 20 county Western North
Carolina Region which includes Ashe, Avery, Burke, Buncombe, Cherokee,
Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison,
Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, and Yancey
Counties. Within the Region, there is a wide variance of topography. Metropolitan Asheville and the other Upper French Broad Counties possess rugged mountains but also sizeable amounts of reasonably flat land. The counties to the west and north of Metropolitan Asheville, however, are comprised almost entirely of high rugged mountains; and the counties to the east of Metropolitan Asheville are partially mountainous and partially rolling plateau. As a consequence, the counties comprising the Western North Carolina
Region - i.e. the area served by Metropolitan Asheville - possess strong
cultural and geographical ties but are not homogeneous. The most
advanced economy, the greatest concentration of urban economic
activities, and the largest population is presently found in the Upper
French Broad Basin - particularly in Metropolitan Asheville; and it is
here that the potential for future growth and economic development is
the greatest. Prior to the Great Depression, Metropolitan Asheville (and particularly the City of Asheville) was a thriving and rapidly growing area. However, from 1930 to I960, the rate of population growth declined sharply. In fact, growth in Metropolitan Asheville was more characteristic of a small urbanized area than of a Metropolitan Area. Since 1960, however, tremendous progress has been made. Metropolitan Asheville is still the second smallest and slowest growing Metropolitan Area in North Carolina but is at last on the move, exhibiting growth which is more in keeping with that characteristic of Metropolitan Areas. Population |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 3 |
growth in the Western North Carolina Region has likewise declined
sharply in the last 35 years, but like Metropolitan Asheville, it has
shown considerable improvement since 1960. This growth, however, has not
been uniform and is concentrated primarily in the counties of the Upper
French Broad Basin and in Burke County. As a consequence of the growth
patterns of the Region, Western North Carolina's proportionate share of
the State's population has declined from almost 15 percent in 1900 to
approximately 11 percent in 1965. From 1950 to 1960, Metropolitan Asheville experienced a net out-migration of approximately 10,000 persons, and the Western North Carolina Region a net out-migration of approximately 71,000 persons. While all age groups lost, heaviest migration occurred in the young to middle age groups. As a result, in both Metropolitan Asheville and Western North Carolina, the proportionate share of the population in older groups is increasing and in the younger groups declining. Here again, the trends in Metropolitan Asheville are in contrast to those normally |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 4 |
occurring In Metropolitan Areas,
for most
are attracting rather than losing people. MIGRATION TRENDS - FOR ASHEVILLE SMSA & W.N.C.1950- 1960& 1960 -1965*
*Note: 1950 & 1960 data represents population as of April 1; Source: 1950 & 1960 data -U.S. Census of Population 1960-1965 data - estimates by Dr. C. Horace Hamilton and Eun Sul Lee of N. C. State University |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 5 |
PRESENT AND PROJECTED POPULATION FOR METROPOLITAN ASHEVILLE AND THE CITY
OF ASHEVILLE 1960,1970 & 1980 |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 6 |
Since 1960, it is felt that the
trends of migration have completely changed in Metropolitan Asheville,
and it is estimated that a net in-migration of almost 2,900 persons has
taken place in the last 5 years. For the Region as a whole, it is felt
that out-migration is still occurring but at a reduced rate. However,
sizeable in-migration into several of the Upper French Broad Counties
and Burke County is primarily responsible with many of the smaller, most
distant counties continuing their decline. Taking into consideration
these recent trends, it is expected that sizeable population growth will
characterize Metropolitan Asheville and the City of Asheville in the
future. By 1970, it is projected that the City will have a population of
69,100 and the Metropolitan Area, 147,500; and by 1980, it is expected
that the City will have 86,200 residents and the Metropolitan Area,
196,100. Income Income levels in Metropolitan Asheville traditionally have been above the levels of the Region and State but despite improvement remain far below National levels. As of 1962, per capita income in Metropolitan Asheville was 11.3 percent above that of the State, however, only 81.5 percent that of the Nation. In comparison with other North Carolina Metropolitan Areas, only Winston-Salem has a lower per capita income. For the Western North Carolina Region as a whole, income levels are very low but are improving. Per capita income in 1962 was only 66.9 percent that of Metropolitan Asheville, approximately 75 percent that of North Carolina, and only 54.5 percent that of the Nation. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 7 |
Education Educational levels in Metropolitan Asheville and the City of Asheville are above those of the State, and in the City above those in urban places in the State; however, in Western North Carolina they are below the State, Metropolitan Asheville, Asheville and urban places in the State. Only 30.6 percent of the adults 25 years of age and older in Western North Carolina have completed high school as compared with 40.8 percent for urban places in North Carolina, 32.3 percent for the State, 40.5 percent in Metropolitan Asheville, and 46.4 percent in the City of Asheville. In terms of college graduation, 9.8 percent in urban North |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 8 |
Carolina, 6.3 percent in the State, 7.6 percent in Metropolitan
Asheville, 9.7 percent in the City of Asheville, and only 5.5 percent in
Western North Carolina have attained this level. That interest in education is gaining momentum in Metropolitan Asheville and Western North Carolina is abundantly illustrated by the declining, but yet high, drop-out rate and by the increase in those seeking further training and education (college, industrial, and technical). Actually, in the last several years, the percentage of Metropolitan Asheville and Western North Carolina high school graduates attending college has declined; however, there has been a steady increase in the percentage enrolling in trade, business, nursing schools, etc. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 9 | Of
paramount importance to Metropolitan Asheville has been the growth and
development of Asheville-Biltmore College and Asheville-Buncombe
Technical Institute, as has the growth of all colleges and training
institutions in the Region. Probably, the single most important factor
responsible for the tremendous growth and expansion of manufacturing
jobs in Metropolitan Asheville has been the Asheville-Buncombe
Technical Institute. Housing The quality of housing in the City of Asheville, Metropolitan Asheville and Western North Carolina is below that of urban places in North Carolina; and in Metropolitan Asheville and Western North Carolina, it is below that of the State. Almost 50 percent of the dwelling units in Western North Carolina, approximately 41 percent in Metropolitan Asheville, and approximately 30 percent in the City of Asheville were substandard in 1959. As poor as this seems, tremendous progress was made over the last decade. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 10 |
At present, indications are that
there is an insufficient quantity of decent housing for those persons
engaged in non-supervisory, below-average-wage occupations—both
manufacturing and service—and also in rental units for young, transient
professionals. A great deal of progress was made during the spring and
summer of 1965 in providing housing units for the latter—as witnessed by
the numerous modern, new apartments which were constructed; however,
there is yet a tremendous shortage of decent housing for those who earn
below average wages. Economy For years, employment in Metropolitan Asheville grew very slowly, and the lack of sufficient job opportunities was responsible for the area's large out-migration and the resulting slow growth. In recent years, however, this has changed completely. In the last three years, employment has increased on the average by almost 2,400 jobs per year; and as a result, unemployment and out-migration have steadily declined. As of July, 1965, total employment in Metropolitan Asheville stood at 59,600. By 1980, it is projected that employment will increase by 37,600, at which time over 97,000 persons will be employed. Metropolitan Asheville developed early as the regional center of service for Western North Carolina and as a resort and retirement center. As a consequence, non-manufacturing provided the principal impetus for its early development. However, in the last 15 years—and particularly the last 5—manufacturing has provided the principal impetus for economic development. As a result, the economy of Metropolitan Asheville, in contrast to the National economy which is becoming increasingly service oriented, is becoming increasingly oriented toward manufacturing. In addition, United States Metropolitan Areas are increasingly becoming regional centers of service and less of manufacturing; whereas, in Metropolitan Asheville the service |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 11 | TRENDS IN EMPLOYMENT DISTRIBUTION FOR THE ASHEVILLE SMSA, THE WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA REGION AND THE UNITED STATES 1950,1960,1965 |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 12 |
sector of the economy is becoming relatively less important and the
manufacturing sector more important. To illustrate, in 1950, 69 percent
of the work force in Metropolitan Asheville was employed in
non-manufacturing occupations and 22.3 percent in manufacturing
occupations. By 1965, however, only 63.5 percent of the labor force was
engaged in non-manufacturing employment, but 32.5 percent was employed
in manufacturing jobs. Metropolitan Asheville is still the service center of Western North Carolina and likely will remain so in the future; however, evidence indicates that Metropolitan Asheville is being successfully challenged by other Metropolitan Areas in North Carolina and Tennessee for the Region's business. In terms of retail trade, the performance of Metropolitan Asheville is excellent; however, in terms of wholesale, it is very poor. Also, the performance of selected service leaves much to be desired. In only hotel and motel services does Metropolitan Asheville perform well. Entertainment services are not what they should be or on a par with what one usually finds in Metropolitan Areas.Contrary to popular opinion, manufacturing accounts for a larger proportion of the work force in Western North Carolina than in the Nation and has for years. In addition, the proportion engaged in |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 13 | [ chart] Recent Employment Trends for the Asheville SMSA |
![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 14 | [chart] present and projected employment, 1965, 1970, & 1980 - Asheville smsa |
![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 15 |
manufacturing is constantly increasing—from 27.8 percent in 1950 to 38.5 percent in 1965; however, unlike Metropolitan Asheville, the non-manufacturing sector of the economy is also increasing. This has been brought about by a rapid decline in agricultural employment. In fact, between 1950 and 1965, the proportion of the work force in Western North Carolina employed in agriculture declined by over 300 percent—from 24.3 percent of the total work force to 8.4 percent. CONCLUSION 1. Metropolitan Asheville is the service center of Western North
Carolina and the hub of one of the Nation's most vital recreation areas.
However, except for retail trade and hotel and motel services, the
performance of services in Metropolitan Asheville is not what it could
or should be (this is particularly true of wholesale trade), and
competition from other areas is becoming increasingly strong. The new
highways upon which Metropolitan Asheville is counting so heavily to
boost economic development could also have the opposite effect if proper
steps are not taken to insure that Metropolitan Asheville has as much,
if not more, to offer than the areas with which it is competing for the
Region's business. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 16 |
quently, It is likely that in the future Metropolitan Asheville and
several of the Upper French Broad Counties will be the principal growth
areas of Western North Carolina. In fact, it is probable that most of the smaller, less-developed counties will continue to decline in population or at best experience only small gains. Topography is sever [sic], and large expanses of level land suitable for development are few and far between; services are inadequate; educational attainments are low; and job skills are few. Subsequently, modern industry hesitates to come in, thus paving the way for the low-paying, manpower-exploiting industry which does not provide opportunities equal to the abilities of the best-educated and most-capable youth; therefore, they continue to leave for greener pastures. If these persons are to be kept from completely leaving the Region, it is primarily up to Metropolitan Asheville and, to a lesser extent, the other Upper French Broad Counties to provide employment for them, for it is doubtful that the other counties can. 3. Metropolitan Asheville has done an outstanding job of attracting manufacturing industry in recent years; however, except for those activities related to the tourist and travel industry, it has not sufficiently promoted or taken advantage of the opportunities offered by non-manufacturing industry. Contrary to popular opinion, non-manufacturing activities can be equally as basic - i.e. bring outside money into the community - as manufacturing activity. Services are a source and reason for growth - not just a result. In fact, generally areas which are service oriented are the fastest growing and most prosperous.4. To a very great extent, the health and welfare of Metropolitan Asheville is closely tied to downtown Asheville. If the core is modern, lively, and pulsating, it is likely that the Metropolitan Area will be also; however, if the core is obsolete and decayed, it is likely that the entire Metropolitan Area will suffer because of It. The heavy concentration of many and |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 17 |
varied activities provides a variety and excitement which can only be
found in the downtown area, and it is this sort of attraction which
serves as a magnet for people who come from miles around, as well as to
business development. 5. What Metropolitan Asheville is in the future will largely be a reflection of the employment in which its citizenry earns their livelihood. Employment will determine what type of people will stay and work here, what type will leave, and what type will move in from other areas. If high quality employment is provided, Metropolitan Asheville will be comprised primarily of well-educated, well-paid, and well-housed citizens; however, if the quality of employment is poor, the citizens will likely be poorly paid, poorly housed and poorly educated. In other words, what Metropolitan Asheville is in the future will primarily be determined by the type of people living here which, in turn, will be determined by the type of employment provided. 6. The more training and education Metropolitan Asheville's labor force has and the greater the diversification of skills possessed by its labor force, the easier it will be to attract industry. A diversity of skills will open the way for industry which otherwise might not consider the area because of an absence of certain necessary skills. This will also serve to raise wages. 7. High levels of training and education are the key to growth and economic development; however, highly skilled persons are subject to nationwide cost competition and subsequently have a high tendency to out-migrate. Therefore, employment offering wages and opportunities equal to those offered nationwide must be provided if these persons are to be prevented from leaving. Only when this happens will in-migration replace out-migration. On the other hand, unskilled and poorly educated persons have little to offer and subsequently have little tendency to move. Consequently, some employment requiring few skills and little education must also be developed in order to keep these people off welfare and unemployment rolls. 8. At present, Metropolitan Asheville serves primarily as a base of operations for tourists |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 18 | and
visitors but loses most of them to other areas of Western North Carolina
during the day. Generally speaking, development of outdoor attractions
such as fishing, hunting, camping, picnicking, skiing, sightseeing,
etc., should continue to be concentrated in outlying counties. In the
first place, they are less developed, generally more suitable, and have
more potential for this type of development; and secondly, for many
counties of the Region this type of economic activity provides the best,
if not the only, avenue for economic development. Metropolitan Asheville
would benefit greatly from this type of development because thousands of
those who spend their daytime hours in these outlying areas would
continue to patronize local lodging and eating establishments, and local
businesses would provide a large portion of the goods and services
required by outlying facilities. On the other hand, the type of tourist
development most conducive to Metropolitan Asheville is that which
provides nighttime entertainment for the many visitors who return from
outlying areas of the Region to spend the night in Metropolitan
Asheville. 9. A thriving cultural life in Asheville can increase our tourist and convention business, attract new industry, provide a favorable environment for recruiting personnel from other localities, and enrich the experience of the entire community. 10. Metropolitan Asheville must constantly be alert to the need for feasibility studies, marketing analyses, and the collection and appraisal of other material essential to the establishment of new industries and businesses and the expansion of existing ones. 11. A crucial element in any given community is the availability of enough land suitable to its particular needs. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 19 |
RECOMMENDATIONS 1. In keeping with the goals and philosophy of the Appalachian Program, Metropolitan Asheville should do everything possible to get people out of the areas of Western North Carolina which have no growth potential and will never have enough available jobs. This can be accomplished by making jobs available not only for local people, but also for those residing throughout Western North Carolina. 2. Metropolitan Asheville should actively promote the development of non-manufacturing industry (e.g. government services, professional services, district and regional administrative, distribution and sales offices and functions, etc.) with vigor equal to that exerted in promoting manufacturing industry. Probably the best way to accomplish this is to establish within the framework of the Asheville Chamber of Commerce a council similar to the Industrial Council which will be charged with the responsibility of promoting non-manufacturing economic development. To do the job properly and with any degree of success, a paid, professional staff should be provided.* This is not to say that manufacturing industry should be promoted less, but rather that non-manufacturing industry should be promoted more. Metropolitan Asheville should endeavor to bring its economy more in line with national and metropolitan trends, which would indicate that Metropolitan Asheville should become more service-oriented. 3. Metropolitan Asheville should continually work to insure that new industry attracted to the area is predominantly modern, high-quality, capital-intensive, high-wage, high-growth industry. In other words, Metropolitan Asheville should be particular and selective in the type __________________________ |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 20 | of
manufacturing industry which it promotes and develops. There is yet a
need, however, to attract some labor-intensive, manpower-exploiting,
low-wage industry, because there are still many persons who simply do
not have education and training necessary to secure employment in the
higher quality manufacturing industries. 4. Feasibility studies should be made for the purpose of determining what types of economic activities could be successfully developed in Metropolitan Asheville. Of particular significance would be studies designed to determine what types of components, raw materials, and finished products are purchased outside Western North Carolina and Metropolitan Asheville by plants which could be better and more cheaply served by suppliers located in Metropolitan Asheville. With such information, Metropolitan Asheville would be in a strong position to promote the development of such establishments to supply items presently imported by area businesses and industries. Probably, the best manner in which to accomplish this would be to establish a strong professional research staff within the framework of the Chamber of Commerce. The preparation of the above enumerated studies would be included in the responsibilities of the staff. 5. Asheville should endeavor to do all that is humanly and financially possible to renovate, revitalize, and modernize the downtown area. 6. Metropolitan Asheville should actively work for and support to the fullest all efforts to improve, upgrade and expand all types of educational institutions and programs. A. All possible support should be given to new public school construction, attempts to acquire new up-to-date equipment and supplies, and upgrading of teachers' salary supplements to insure that the most able teachers are retained as well as insure the attraction of the highest quality new teachers. B. Support should be given to the proposal for consolidation of city and county schools. C. Vocational, technical, and adult education programs should be broadened, strengthened, and expanded. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 21 | D.
All possible support, particularly financial, should be given to the
colleges of Metropolitan Asheville and Western North Carolina so that
they will be able to adequately meet the demands which will be made upon
them. E. Work should commence to develop a university level educational institution in Western North Carolina. Metropolitan Asheville, as the regional center of service for Western North Carolina, should also be the educational and cultural center. Metropolitan Asheville has the best geographical location and transportation network which will make it more accessible and best able to serve Western North Carolina. In addition, it is the only area in Western North Carolina having a large population which means it would be better able to support the various functions and programs characteristic of a university (e.g. athletic, cultural, etc.) Also, due to its degree of economic development, Metropolitan Asheville has the greatest need of any area in Western North Carolina for a university, and it would be of greater service in Metropolitan Asheville than anywhere else. (Many industries and businesses stated that a university would be of great value to them. Faculty members could be used as consultants, and employees could pursue further study — particularly on the graduate level. In fact, the absence of a university in Metropolitan Asheville has on occasion reportedly deterred the development of some types of industry, and some industries—particularly those scientifically oriented — reported that the absence of a university has been a major problem in recruiting key personnel.) Probably the best method to accomplish this would be to follow the example of Charlotte College and work to develop Asheville-Biltmore College into a branch of the University of North Carolina. It is probable that the job Metropolitan Asheville does in the area of education, more than any other, will determine the success or failure of Metropolitan Asheville to grow and elevate its economic level to National standards. 7. In order to make Metropolitan Asheville more than merely a place for travelers to eat and sleep, and in order to fully utilize the potential for capturing the visitors' dollars, as well as to make Metropolitan Asheville a more desirable place to work and live thereby promoting economic development, Metropolitan Asheville should: A. Promote and support arts to the fullest, not only for local inhabitants but on a scale which would attract tourists, conventions, vacationers, etc.—including summer theaters having top entertainers. The proposal to construct a Civic Arts Center should be vigorously supported. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 22 | B.
Promote the development of luxury type resort complexes which could
serve as major attractions in themselves and which would tend to
increase the length of time of visitors' stay (preferably highly
concentrated). C. Primarily concentrate its efforts at promoting and developing tourist attractions to that type of development which provides principally nighttime entertainment (e.g. night clubs featuring floor shows and like entertainment, theaters, etc.), leaving the development of outside attractions (e.g. camping, fishing, hunting, skiing, etc.) primarily to the outlying sections of Western North Carolina which are more suitable and have more potential for this type of development. 8. Metropolitan Asheville, as a growing urban complex, needs more coordinated county and city functions—at least start planning for them in the future. In addition to smoother transitions and better services, especially when annexed, it will make possible the acquisition of important data now impossible to obtain. 9. Metropolitan Asheville needs county-wide zoning to protect property values, but more importantly to insure that prime industrial and commercial sites are preserved until needed. At this time and stage in Metropolitan Asheville's development, there seems to be a never-ending supply of land for any and all uses; however, if Metropolitan Asheville lives up to its potential for growth and economic development, it is possible-and indeed probable-that economic development could, at some time in the future, be retarded by a lack of suitable land. In addition, by determining the future use which the land will have, local government can do a better, more efficient and cheaper job of providing the services and facilities necessary to make development possible. 10. Local government should make it a point to know what industries want of it and where it may be falling down in their legitimate needs. Asheville should consider placing a staffman in the office of the City Manager with responsibility for the local industrial community, because often times industry has a tendency to stand off from local government and regard it as |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| 23 | a
kind of foreign power and waits until a snag arises and immediate
objectives are to be gained. 11. Future annexations by the City of Asheville should be preceeded by annexation studies. The purpose of these studies would be to determine if and when the revenues received by the City from the areas under consideration for annexation will be equal to or greater than the cost of providing the necessary services and facilities. This will insure that areas annexed by the City will be able to pay their own way and will not be liabilities to the residents already within the City. 12. Metropolitan Asheville should break the bonds of extreme caution which have retarded and strangled it since the Great Depression. It should study and where feasible, emulate the successful deeds and projects of other Metropolitan Areas and innovate new projects of its own. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| HOME | ||||||||||||||||||