|
University of North Carolina
at Asheville Register for: |
|
|
|
|
| Title | "Public Hearing on the East Riverside Urban Renewal Project Given by the Asheville Redevelopment Commission, 1966" |
| Alt. Title | "Public Hearing on the East Riverside Urban Renewal Project Given by the Asheville Redevelopment Commission, 1966" |
| Identifier |
http://toto.lib.unca.edu/findingaids/mss/housing_authority_city_asheville/series_26_publications/public_hearing/ default_public_hearing.htm |
| Creator | Housing Authority of the City of Asheville -- NC R-48 East Riverside Urban Renewal Project |
| Alt Creator | Awa N. Edney, Court Reporter |
| Subject Keyword | acquisition ; Algary, W.F. ; Allen, W.C. ; Anthony Redmond ; Asheville City Council ; Asheville, NC ; Asheville Planning and Zoning Commission ; Asheville Redevelopment Commission ; Awa N. Edney ; Beale, Burnitt, Jr. ; blight ; Buncombe County Planning Council ; Burnitt Beale, Jr. ; Citizens Advisory Committee ; city planning ; civic improvement ; Civil Rights Bill of 1966 ; community building ; court reporter ; Dailey, Rubin ; Dr. David K. Hall ; Dr. Joseph Schandler ; East Riverside Renewal Project ; Edney, Awa N. ; Eleanor Pickard ; Eric Hill Associates ; Eugene C. Ochsenreiter, Jr. ; Fannie B. McCoy ; federal aid ; federal funding ; federal rehabilitation grant ; Frances Owens ; Grant, Reverend Wesley ; Grayson, Norma ; Greer, James W. ; grocery store ; Hall, Dr. David K. ; Henry, Ned ; Hillcrest ; housing ; Housing Authority of the City of Asheville ; housing code ; home ownership ; inspection ; interview ; Jacques Laboureur ; J. Alfred Miller ; James W. Greer ; Joseph Sternberg ; Kent Washburn ; Laboureur, Jacques ; Lee Walker Heights ; Leilani Littlejohn ; LePore, Vito ; library ; Littlejohn, Leilani ; living standards ; low rent public housing ; maintenance ; McCoy, Fannie B. ; Michael, Otis B. ; Miller, J. Alfred ; modernization ; Mrs. Harry Thompson ; Mrs. Roy Rogers ; NC R-48 East Riverside Urban Renewal Project ; Ned Henry ; neighborhood ; Norma Grayson ; Ochsenreiter, Eugene C., Jr. ; Opportunity Corporation ; Otis B. Michael ; Owens, Frances ; parks ; Pickard, Eleanor ; Pisgah View ; playgrounds ; preservation ; property ; public facilities ; Public Health Department ; public hearing ; public housing ; Public Welfare Department ; Redmond, Anthony ; rehabilitation ; relocation ; rent ; Reverend Wesley Grant ; Rogers, Mrs. Roy ; Roland, William E. ; Rubin Dailey ; Schandler, Dr. Joseph ; school ; sidewalk ; Sternberg, Joseph ; street repair ; Title IV ; Thompson, Mrs. Harry ; upkeep ; urban planning ; urban renewal ; Vito LePore ; Washburn, Kent ; W.C. Allen ; W.F. Algary ; William E. Roland ; World Wide Baptist Tabernacle ; YMCA ; |
| Subject LCSH |
City planning -- North Carolina --
Asheville
|
| Date | May 31, 1966 |
| Publisher | Housing Authority of the City of Asheville |
| Contributor |
Awa N. Edney, Court Reporter |
| Type | text |
| Format | Book ; 8 1/2" x 11" |
| Source | D. H. Ramsey Library Special Collections, Manuscript Collections M2007.12.?? |
| Language | English |
| Relation | Is part of: Asheville Urban Renewal Files, D. H. Ramsey Library, Special Collections, UNCA. |
| Coverage | 1966 |
| Rights | Any display, publication or public use
must credit D. H. Ramsey Library, Special Collections, University of
North Carolina at Asheville. Copyright retained by the authors of certain items in the collection, or their descendants, as stipulated by United States copyright law. |
| Donor | Donor 310 ; City of Asheville, NC. |
| Description |
This publication is a transcription of a public hearing on the East Riverside Urban Renewal Project held on May 31, 1966. Members of the Asheville Redevelopment Commission, most notably Board of Commissioners Chairman J. Alfred Miller and Executive Director James W. Greer, spoke on the proposed urban renewal, its costs and benefits, and the details of housing acquisition, rehabilitation, and relocation. Roughly the first half of the meeting was Mr. Miller and Mr. Greer’s remarks, and then the floor was opened for questions and comments from the community members in attendance. Comments included an inquiry into the building of a library; a criticism of the renewal project, the proposed Civil Rights Act of 1966’s Title IV provision that the speaker claimed would “destroy his traditional right of private property ownership,” and the American government in general as a “Communist government”; inquiries into the cost of renting and owning a home as opposed to renting in the new public housing buildings (as many people expressed an interest in home ownership over renting); reminders to listen to the Redevelopment Commission people instead of the “man-on-the-street,” especially concerning those homes slated for acquisition and demolition. Much of the conversation centered on two issues: persuading the audience that the urban renewal was a good deal economically and dispelling misconceptions about the housing, rent, and public housing situations. One of the closing remarks came from W.F. Algary, member of the City Council, who attempted to garner support and enthusiasm for the project in general, and public housing in particular, with the following words: “I have heard a great many people say great criticism about these things [public housing], that people pour millions of dollars into them and people move into them, they tear up the houses and they disregard the parks and the shrubbery and the flowers, and so forth. I know this is going to be different, and I hope to see that when this is even started that community areas will be developed…and you will have various areas that will be vying with each other to see who can make their area the most attractive area in the City…Now you people have an opportunity to prove to yourselves, to the City of Asheville and the State of North Carolina, that you can really make this project worthwhile and it will be one where anyone, regardless of race, creed, or color, will be damn glad to live.” |
| Acquisition | 2007- |
| Citation | Asheville Urban Renewal Files, "Public Hearing on the East Riverside Urban Renewal Project Given by the Asheville Redevelopment Commission." D. H. Ramsey Library, Special Collections, University of North Carolina at Asheville 28804 |
| Processed by | Special Collections staff 2008 DB |
| Last update | 2008-05-20 |
| PAGE | DESCRIPTION | THUMBNAIL |
| Cover |
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE EAST RIVERSIDE
Reported by: |
![]() |
| 1 |
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE EAST RIVERSIDE PRESENT: Commissioners: |
![]() |
| 2 | Assistant Director, Mr. LePore right here, and
Jacques Laboureur, who is from Atlanta, Georgia. He is with the Eric Hill Associates from Atlanta, Georgia, one of the planners on the project. The purpose of this meeting is held in accordance with the North Carolina and Federal law so that each person who may have an opinion to express on the East Riverside Urban Renewal area may do so. This is a public hearing. It is held for this purpose. Any comment or recommendations you might have will be heard and considered prior to the Commission formally approving the redevelopment project. After Mr. Greer, the Director, reviews the project and plans for us, we will ask for any comment from any and all of you. The Chair, however, requests that each speaker hold his or her remarks to three minutes so that each person here will have an opportunity to express their wishes. I would like to ask for all of you who would like to speak please come to the front of the room where there is a microphone, and give your name and address. I would like to add that this meeting is being recorded on tape and by Court Reporter. The Chair asks that no questions be asked as to individual pieces of property. The Commission's staff will be available after this meeting to answer any such questions, or at any time during the |
![]() |
| 3 |
wwek [sic] from Monday through Friday, Room 604 in the
City Building. |
![]() |
| 4 |
Commission applied for Federal funds to make a detailed
study of the area. This has been done. You are here
tonight to review these studies and recommendations
and to hear from you and your comments. At this time
I would like to call on Mr. Greer to review the plan
for you. Mr. Greer. MR. JAMES W. GREER: Thank you, Mr. Miller. If you don't mind, I will step down in front where I can get at this microphone. Excuse me. The East Riverside Urban Renewal area, as you can see by this map here, or the several maps on the wall, is composed or is a rather large area composed of approximately 410 acres. The boundary, general boundary, of the East Riverside area is Milliard Avenue on the north, the property fronting on Coxe Avenue, Southside Avenue, and generally the property fronting on Biltmore Avenue on the east, the property line of St. Genevieve-of-the-Pines and the south property line of Walton Street Park on the south, and the track of the Southern Railway, Depot Street and Clingman Avenue on the west. The Redevelopment Commission in trying to arrive at plans for this area has taken into consideration every single one of approximately 1,300 structures in the area. Each structure was inspected and graded according to its physical condition. Interviews were held with almost |
![]() |
| 5 | every family living in the East Riverside area.
After the interviews and inspections were completed, this
information was turned over to a planning consultant who was
hired to advise this Commission as to what the best course would be
in trying to preserve the good property in the area and how best to
eliminate the bad property and what could best be replaced in the
area. Now, the maps that are over here on the wall, the areas on the one map that has the various colors, the green, the yellow, the orange, the red, blue, and so on, every area that is colored one color or another indicates an area that the Redevelopment Commission anticipates buying, and in turn the Redevelopment Commission anticipates reselling for some type use. The proposed uses in the redevelopment area are all types of residential and some limited commercial reuse. We anticipate the construction by the Asheville Housing Authority of 500 units of low-rent public housing. This is not the type of public housing that we have in Asheville at the present time as shown by Lee Walker Heights, Pisgah View and Hillcrest. The housing units that are planned for this area are primarily one-story single family duplex or triplex units. A few buildings will have more than three families but there will be very few. The housing units are designed to be a |
![]() |
| 6 | family type ordinary neighborhood type unit rather
than barracks type as we are used to in Asheville. In the provision
of the low-rent public housing playgrounds, recreational space will
be provided. Federal law requires that a certain amount of
playground space be provided. Also, the Housing Authority will have
what we know as "Tot Lots". These are small play areas for
younger children. It might have swings, teeter-totters, sliding
boards and sand boxes. They generally are fenced in so that the
children can't wander off. The larger recreational areas will be for
the older children, and adjacent to the housing units will be
designed several playgrounds of larger scope, one park, a
neighborhood park of twelve acres, two or three other neighborhood playgrounds from one acre to
three acres. In addition to this, adjoining the housing units in the
various spots throughout the East Riverside area are so called-green
open spaces. This will be an area in which the City will plant
grass, plant shrubbery, and will maintain and beautify it. In addition to the 500 units of low-rent public housing, we anticipate that anywhere between 150 and 200 units of houses will be built by private means. This will be some apartments and some single family houses. In addition to this, there will be |
![]() |
| 7 | provided areas for commercial use, limited commercial use for neighborhood stores and shops so that you don't have to travel two miles or a mile and a half to pick up a load of bread or a carton of milk. In addition to this, land will be made available for the expansion of the two schools in the area. Land will be made available for necessary parking for churches for churches desiring additional land. A branch of the YMCA is planned to go in this area. Just where yet we do not know. The YMCA has not firmly decided where they anticipate putting the branch Y. A new fire station and community building will be constructed adjacent to one of the parks. This is something this area has lacked for a good many years and under this program a community building and new fire station will be provided by the City. Of course, the streets will be upgraded. The streets needing paving will be paved. New sidewalks will be constructed. Where necessary new streets will be built from the bottom up. In the carrying out of the project and in arriving at the point where we are going to have the new construction and we are going to have the necessary public facilities, it is, of course, necessary to eliminate a lot of bad houses. These are houses that are in poor structural condition at the present time, and just because a house |
![]() |
| 8 | lacks wiring, doesn't have the necessary plumbing,
or needs a roof or needs painting, doesn't mean that the
Redevelopment Commission intends to buy the property. It is the
intention of this Commission and has been form the very beginning
that any property that could economically be rehabilitated; that is,
brought up to the standard of the Housing Code of the City of
Asheville, then the owners would be encouraged to do the necessary
improvement. In a very, very few instances, the Commission has found
it necessary to acquire some property that ordinarily we would not
have acquired because it is in the way of a street, a necessary
playground, or it is necessary to round out a parcel of land that
will be used for public housing or some other type of redevelopment.
I think it should be stressed that it is the Commission's intention to preserve as much of the original neighborhood in this neighborhood as is possible. What cannot be saved, what the owner refuses to rehabilitate, it will be necessary for this Commission to acquire. Of course, in carrying out the project, the East Riverside Urban Renewal Project, a great deal of emphasis is being given to the side of the people. This is not a program designed in this particular instance |
![]() |
| 9 | where we are only concerned with land and buildings.
We have done a great many things to date and will be continuing to
do them in the future that are concerned one hundred per cent with
the people of the area, their thoughts, their considerations, their
recommendations, their problems and their needs. Now,
obviously we cannot come in and solve every problem of every person
that we must deal with. We hope to pinpoint the problems and through
working with the Opportunity Corporation, which is the local poverty
program group in Asheville and Buncombe County, by working with the
low-rent public housing, by working with the Welfare Department,
Public Health Department, and various social agencies, we hope to
solve some of the problems. Some of the problems I don't believe we
can solve. We hope these are in the minority. We expect them to be
in the minority. Some of the reasons other than just bad structural condition for which we are carrying out the redevelopment project is the tremendous range of social problems in terms of disease and crime, health problems and fire problems that we find in the area. We found that although this area contains eight per cent of the City's population, that in every case of venereal disease, tuberculosis, fire, rape, arson, |
![]() |
| 10 |
murder, that more than eight per cent of the
occurrence of these happenings in the City of Asheville are found in
this area. Fifty per cent of rapes and assaults are found in this
area. Fourteen per cent of the City's fires are found in this area.
Twenty-six per cent of the venereal disease reported in the City of
Asheville is found in this area. We can go on and on. TB is fourteen
per cent. Fourteen per cent of the TB in Asheville is found in
this area. These are what we refer to as social indices of blight.
In other words, these are things that occur in blighted or slum
areas because the area is slum and blighted. We have Nasty Creek,
which you are all familiar with. It is very nasty. It is a disease
carrier and germ ridden. The Commission and the City together have
plans to clean this creek up to rid the community of a very bad
situation. We cannot cover the creek. We do not have plans to do
that. We will and must carry out detailed inspections of land areas
adjoining the East Riverside area to make sure that no sanitary
sewers and no industrial effluent is being dumped into this creek
which gives forth its stench and carries disease germs. |
![]() |
| 11 | Perhaps you might like to look at it after the
meeting is over a little bit closer. We have a map showing what we
think and what we are sure the area will look like after urban
renewal. Now, you will look at this map and you will say, " Well,
that's just a pretty picture. That will never come to be." I can
assure you that it has come to be in hundreds of communities across
our nation, in dozens of communities in North Carolina, and there is
no reason why it can't come to pass in Asheville. We have here the brown structures. The structures shown in brown are buildings of the low-rent public housing. The structures shown in green is the private housing, both apartments and single family swelling [sic]. The structures shown in red are some type of commercial operation, primarily service and neighborhood commercial serving residential areas. We have some blue structures. These, again, are some type of service unit for the proposed East Riverside area. Here's the fire station and community building, this little purple building down here. All the large amount of gray area which you see is that area contained within the boundary of the East Riverside Project which the Redevelopment Commission does not anticipate buying. This is property, this reflects properties that can be |
![]() |
| 12 | rehabilitated by the owner if they see fit. Now, of course, in carrying out a project of this size dealing with 410 acres, 4,800 people and 1,300 structures, it is going to cost money. I am sure that if I gave you all of these figures I have here it could confuse most of you. It is very confusing to those of us who work in the business day in and day out, because you all are aware that any time you are dealing with any type of governmental operation, and this certainly is one, there is a lot of red tape, there are a lot of indirect things you have to consider that add to the cost. I will just give you a few cost figures here to give you an idea of what this thing will entail. The net cost, this is the cost of carrying out the redevelopment project less the sale of land, less the sale of land, is $8,742,002.00. $8,742,002.00. The City of Asheville's one-third share n the program, -- of course, the City of Asheville will contribute one-third of the net cost, -- is $2,914,000.00. The Federal government will contribute in the carrying out of this project, part of which money will be for relocation, part of which money will be for rehabilitation, and I will explain these to you in a minute, the total Federal contribution is $6,468,602.00. Now of the City's $2,914,000.00 one-third share, as Mr. Miller |
![]() |
| 13 | pointed out a while ago, the new high school that has been constructed in the area will contribute part of the City's one-third share. This means that the City does not have to get the money on their part to pay out as part of their contribution but this is a contribution that is furnished as part of the School Board's work in planning schools for the City and County. The school itself will contribute $826,244.00 as credits. The low-rent public housing, the 500 units that will be built in this area, will contribute as part of the City's one-third share. Here again, the City does not have to dig down in its pocket to get this money. The low-rent public housing will contribute $839,652.00. What we come to is that the total cost to the City, the cash that has to come out of the City's pocket for the new fire station, the parks, the playgrounds, streets, new water mains, new sewer line, the cash that they will give the Redevelopment Commission, and figuring for contingencies, amounts to $1,400,000.00. This is the total City contribution. In other words, we are getting a project of almost $10,000,000.00 total cost for a total cost to the City of $1,400,000.00. This, if we want to carry out the urban renewal project, is very, very favorable financing. Most cities are not fortunate enough to |
![]() |
| 14 | have this type of contribution toward the carrying out of the redevelopment project. Now, I mentioned that in the City's or in the Federal government's contribution, money will be allowed or will be given to the Commission for the purpose of relocating families, individuals and businesses. Both the Federal government and the State of North Carolina require that all the families and individuals be offered a decent, safe and sanitary place to live before they are required to move from where they presently live. In other words, if we buy the house in which you are now living, or if you are living in a house which we end up buying in the East Riverside area, you do not have to move unless and until you are offered a house or apartment that meets the minimum housing code standard of the City of Asheville. We realize this is going to be the hardest part of our job, is furnishing of standard housing accommodations. Part of the standard housing accommodations will be 500 units of low-rent public housing. Other housing accommodations will be furnished by the private housing which will be built in the area. Experience had proven over many years that if there is a demand for housing somebody in the community will build them. This is new housing we are talking |
![]() |
| 15 | about, outside the East Riverside boundaries. We
have discussed this matter with a number of builders and real estate
people who assure us if someone wants a house they build it for
them. That is their business and that's how they make their money.
You may think because nobody has been building houses in the City of
Asheville for lo [?] these many years that you might want to live in
or can afford to live in or are being built in an area that you
might want to live in that they will not be built. This is not the
case. Housing will be built if there is a demand. Now, those people who anticipate fixing up their property and bringing it up to the standard of the City of Asheville, the Federal government has several financing plans which will be available. One of these is a twenty-year repayment maximum of $10,000.00 at three per cent interest loan. This is for those people who cannot afford to borrow money on the private market at six, or six and a half or seven per cent interest, but who can afford to borrow money and pay three per cent interest. As you all know that anybody who borrowed money or buys things on time, the interest charges amount to a large percentage of what you pay back. Cutting the interest rate in half for this purpose will be, we think, of a great deal of assistance |
![]() |
| 16 | for anyone who utilizes this financing method. Another method is for those families where the head of the household is sixty-two years of age or older and who cannot economically afford to borrow money even at a three per cent interest rate, the Federal government under certain conditions will give an outright grant up to $1,500.00 to fix up the property. This is if the $1,500.00 or less will bring it up to standard. What we are saying is that someone whom the statisticians and sociologists say is elderly, or perhaps we have a man sixty-three years old and his wife is fifty-eight and they still have a couple of kids staying at home or a couple of grandchildren, and this is where we consider that the head of the family is elderly and therefore is eligible for this grant. This doesn't mean that everyone who wants a grant of $1,500.00 is going to get it. This means if you do not have the money to fix up your property, cannot borrow money on your income to fix up your property, that the Federal government will make available under certain conditions an amount up to $1,500.00 to rehabilitate the property. I don't think that I can add any more right now. I feel like I have probably talked too long already. I am sure there are a lot of questions that the people have, but prior to getting to the questions, |
![]() |
| 17 | I think Mr. Miller stated that he would like to hear
from anyone in the room, or those of you in the room who have some
comment to make concerning the redevelopment project. Bear in mind
that Mr. Miller, the Chairman, has requested that no questions be
asked on individual pieces of property, "Will my house be taken," or
"What's going to happen to this house or what's going to happen to
that house." We do not have the time to go through every single
house here tonight. We will be available. There are several staff
members here with us tonight. We will all be glad to go over individual
questions after the meeting, or if you would like to come to our
office, 604 City Building, or Mr. LePore's office at 86 Livingston
Street, certainly individual questions will be answered as to what
will become of each individual piece of property and what the plans
are for that particular area. Mr. Miller. CHAIRMAN MILLER: Thank you, Mr. Greer. At this time the Chair will recognize any of those who would like to ask a question or have any comments to make. Will you come up and give your name and address, please? FRANCES OWENS: My name is Frances Owens. My address is 163 Ashland Avenue. Before, when we talked about the redevelopment in five states, you |
![]() |
| 18 | mentioned a library connected with this. What about
it now? This time you mentioned a community building. What about the
library? MR. GREER: The last time we talked with the City -- I will turn the microphone around here so we can get this on the tape properly -- the last time we discussed this matter with the City, they indicated that they did not know without further studies whether a library would be necessary in this area inasmuch as the South French Broad School was in the area and the Livingston Street Elementary School, and they said that they would before they excluded a library, they would study the matter farther to see whether it was advisable to have a library in connection with the community center. This is as far as we have gone right now. FRANCES OWENS: The schools are not open in the summer time. MR. GREER: Well, this reply that we got indicated that the City administration was concerned with the problem and was going to take some steps to have a library available. Whether this would be the schools' or whether it would be a part of the community center we do not have that answer yet. CHAIRMAN MILLER: Anyone else? FANNIE B. McCOY: I would like to speak. |
![]() |
| 19 | MR. GREER: If you will give
your name, please, and your address. Let me turn this around, please. CHAIRMAN MILLER: If you will give your name, please. FANNIE B. McCOY: Fannie B. McCoy, 95 Church Street. CHAIRMAN MILLER: Thank you. FANNIE B. McCOY: This paper comes from Washington, D.C. Realtors headliners warns of the destruction of the rights of private owners of property under Title IV. Forcing an unwilling owner to sell or rent his home to someone not of his choice would destroy his traditional right of private property ownership, his Committee in the House warned last week. Allen F. Emory, in asking Congress to reject Title IV of the so-called Civil Rights Bill of 1966 pointed out the basic right enjoyed by Americans is that he need not become an unwilling contractor to any other person. Mr. Emory explained that A desires to buy B's home, but A does not have the right to buy B's home unless there is a valid contract. I ask you to write in and object to the passing of the bill. Here's another thing I would like to call your attention to. The majority of the people prefer single family homes to live in. |
![]() |
| 20 | The overwhelming majority of Americans prefer to live in single family homes well out from the central metropolitan area. A separate survey of the University of Michigan revealed that as one proceeds up the income scale, he prefers to live in a single family home. Ninety per cent of those with income over fifteen thousand prefer individual family homes and that the reason for moving was primarily a need for space in a single family home and the three most often are the floor plan, number of bedrooms and size of rooms. I thought you would like to know the latest on what the people were talking about, and here's some more information I would like to give out. One of the three reasons why I am against the American government -- Communist government, the Communist government, is that it is the same kind that they have in Russia, and we don't need the Russian people to come over here and tell us how to run our homes and tell us what to buy and what we ought to pay. Much damage has been accomplished since the "Metro" wrecking crew arrived in Asheville seven years ago. Their first project is not completed. They have bought and torn down over a million dollars worth of valuable property in the 77-acre tract. Now before they start one building to replace the torn-down buildings, they are jumping over into another field with |
![]() |
| 21 | 425 acres. This crew of busy as bees don't care
about slums. They simply want to control the land so they can
control the man. This is dictatorship, the same kind they have in
Russia. High taxes, poisoned water, and then you come to a time when
the City Council, the Mayor, and the Dictator will be replaced
by men given the jobs, not by voting, all the way for the Democrats,
or voting for the Republicans. It is a matter of taking away the
government by the people and for the people and making it a
socialized, communistic, collectivist organization. This may be the
last time you will be allowed to vote for sheriff. The code laws,
the City Council keeps voting on and taking in from the county. They
care not whether they give you city convenience. They only want to
control you. I contend the City Officials have no right, according
to our laws, to go into the real estate business. They have no
license to practice. Who has charge of the elections in our city?
Does the City Officials run the show or we the people? How can we
keep our freedom in Asheville and Buncombe County? Wake up before it
is too late to complain. Fannie B. McCoy. (Laughter). CHAIRMAN MILLER: Any other questions or comments from anyone? |
![]() |
| 22 | FROM THE FLOOR: Mr.
Chairman? CHAIRMAN MILLER: Just a minute. I recognize this gentleman here. OTIS B. MICHAEL: My name is Otis B. Michael. I live at 64 Phifer Street. First of all I will say that I am in complete accord with the program which you have here. I think it is a good program. However, there are many of us who would like to have better homes, not low-rent homes; would like to have the privilege of relocating as we are sort of boxed in and the value of the real property begins to decrease because of this and I would like to make a part of the record that a formal request to the real estate agents that some of us have talked to that said that they do no buy or sell colored property asked to reconsider and for all of us to help ourselves as much as possible. CHAIRMAN MILLER: Thank you. WESLEY GRANT: Mr. Chairman, I am Wesley Grant, Pastor of the World Wide Baptist Tabernacle. I want to ask this question. It has been stated there will be low house rent. I want to ask this question. Will the redevelopment build houses and sell them to individuals? CHAIRMAN MILLER: Reverend Grant, let me |
![]() |
| 23 | ask you give your address, please. REV. GRANT: 97 Choctaw Street, Asheville. CHAIRMAN MILLER: Thank you. MR. GREER: The Redevelopment Commission is not empowered by either Federal or State law to construct any type of building. The construction of the low-rent public housing will be by the Asheville Housing Authority, and, of course, private construction will be by private individuals and companies. ELEANOR PICKARD: I am Eleanor Pickard, Executive Director of the Buncombe County Planning Council. My home address is 46 Woodvale Avenue. The Buncombe County Planning Council is a social welfare planning council. We are concerned with people, the welfare of people, and we have been working very closely with the Redevelopment Commission in this East Riverside contemplated project because we are so pleased with their concern for people. We all know people need good house, hot and cold running water, good streets, lights, but people need a lot of other things. We are concerned with the Public Welfare Department, the Health Department, education, food, clothes, all things that people need in addition to good houses, and it is for this reason that we favor so much so this contemplated redevelopment project. |
![]() |
| 24 | (Mr. Rubin Dailey
approaches microphone) MR. GREER: Excuse me, Mr. Dailey, before you speak, I might just throw this out. When we talk about low-rent public housing, we are not necessarily talking about poor houses. You know a man and his wife that have five children, I don't care what their income is, they are going to be pretty poor because it just takes a lot of money. This housing that the Asheville Housing Authority will construct is concerned not only with just the poor people who don't have but very little income or no income, but those families who might be, some of them, making a good income but have a large family they must take care of. This housing is to be provided for a lot of different people and not necessarily just poor people. We are not trying to say that you are poor, therefore go live in the housing project. This is not the case. The whole idea of this project and of the work the Asheville Housing Authority is trying to carry out is in the providing of housing, decent, safe, and sanitary housing for people who cannot afford $80.00, $90.00, and $100.00 a month rent, or the $80.00 $90.00 and $100.00 a month house payment. You know there are thousands and thousands of people right here in this city and across the nation that cannot. We are not talking about housing just for the poor. We are |
![]() |
| 25 | talking about housing for the community, period. RUBIN DAILEY: Mr. Chairman and members of the Commission. I see a City Attorney and some member of the City Council here. On of the things that you can't take away from me, I did have the opportunity to vote for this project when I was on the Commission. I was one of the first ones that voted for it. I was in favor of it then and I am in favor of it now. But I want to give out some philosophy as I am capable, some homespun philosophy to these, my worthy citizens, who have assemble here this evening, particularly the negro people. I want you to first remember that I said I am for the project. I voted for it in its inception, because I think it is going to really do something for this section which we have designated. But I want you to do this. We have some trained people on the staff to give information and I want to listen to those people when they visit you or you visit them, and be governed by the advice and instructions that they give you. Now, some of you are ready to ask the question, "What is going to happen to my piece of property, or what's going to happen to Aunt John's or -- Uncle John's or Aunt Susan's piece of property?" If you are going to rely upon you street lawyers, your insurance men, your |
![]() |
| 26 | undertaker, and Lord knows I love them all, -- I hope I don't have to use them all, -- you are really going to be sold down the river. Now, let me give you some advice. The hawks are setting for you right now. They know the people whose properties are going to be bought. I use that term. And you will be approached by the hawks in a friendly manner telling you, "You better get out of this place now, you better start looking for you a place to live, and I have got you a place to live. I have got a place to sell you." And here you go with a panic, and that's what we call hardship cases, and you create them yourselves in the panic. I noticed Mr. Greer said he had field representatives and they do have field representatives who will give you information. I have received from one person who told me that they have seven different types of advice as to what was going to happen to that one piece of property they own, and none of it came from anybody connected with the Redevelopment Commission. All of it came from somebody who knew less about it than the person who talking. Now, if you want to mess yourself up, you listen to that kind of advice. This is going to be a good project. You are going to be benefited. I am going to be benefited from it. Let me tell you something about this philosophy of taking |
![]() |
| 27 | something from Washington. Do you know who lives in Washington? People who come from Asheville and other places. They are human being just like everybody else. Do you know whose money it is up in Washington? It's that little bit that we send up there, and we are getting some of it back. We are entitled to get some of it back. We are going to get eight million dollars for spending two. That's pretty good odds. I think that we are going to have a good project. Now, there's a lot of talk -- some of the things that I discussed -- some of the Commission members will remember when I did it -- and that is because we are going to perpetuate segregation because we are in a predominantly negro section. Well, you own property there. Now, if you want to lift yourself up above by your bootstraps and get out of there, that's your privilege, and I think it is time we ought to start moving wherever we can find property to move, and if we don't like down in the East Riverside project, we can move out, and find a place somewhere we can move. We can develop some place. I have got my eyes on a piece of property now. I will sell you one as soon as I can get it straightened out. ( Laughter.) It can be done. That's what I am convinced that we ought to do. But I am really concerned of the errors that we make in panic when it comes |
![]() |
| 28 | down to a project like this. The thing can be
orderly. You can get your information, and when you get it, pay
attention to it as to how it will affect you, because most of the
people that you talk to in the street about it don't know anything
about it, but you will be discussing it with everybody you come in
contact, and they will have a different idea as to how it is
working. If I didn't think that it was good, I wouldn't tell you
that I was for it. Thank you. (Applause.) DOCTOR JOSEPH SCHANDLER: My name is Doctor Joe Schandler. I am Chairman of the Housing Committee of the City of Asheville. I live at 29 Mount Vernon Circle. The reason I spoke to Mr. Greer, I was late when I came in and I don't know if you were told about the housing that the City of Asheville and the Federal government is subsidizing for us to put in the area. You are used to seeing Pisgah View Apartments. You are used to seeing Hillside and Lee Walker Heights. You will see nothing like that any more in the City of Asheville as far as the Housing Commission is concerned. We are learning from mistakes. A lot of these things we have learned from previous mistakes. We have sent in already to Atlanta and we have had approved plans for our first two projects in the area. The first one if approved and it goes through as we hope it will be, |
![]() |
| 29 | will be a seven-story high rise like any of the finest apartment houses we see in this country. It will be for low rent. It will be only for those people who have a limited income. It will be next to Aston Park so we have plenty of rooms to go out and walk around and sun themselves and be a person with a lot of open land, a lot of land to breathe in. The second area that we have planned that has been approved will be a hundred homes of one family, two family and maybe -- we are not sure -- maybe some three family. One family, two family or three family, and will be low homes. They will not be two storys [sic], one story, and you can take these homes and compare them to any of the finest homes being built in Asheville today. When we have these homes I would dare any one of you to go to any block in this redevelopment area and tell anyone else which is a project home and which one was put up by the Housing Authority. They will be homes that you will be proud to live in. They will be homes that look like the homes you would build if you could afford to build a home like this. There was also a question about a library. There will be a meeting -- nobody knows this except two people, but there will be a meeting toward the end of the month and we are going to ask to that meeting people from the Health Department, the Welfare Department, the Re- |
![]() |
| 30 | development Commission, the City, everybody who is going to be involved, we are gong to put in the house and we are going to ask them to get together with us and everybody that is going in there. Now, the government is giving us, the Housing Commission, money to put up a community building, or the City might put up a community building, the Redevelopment might put up a community building, but we are going to get everybody together and see if we can build a bigger community building by getting everybody together. The same thing with health facilities; the same thing with playgrounds; and we are not going to have the homes next to each other so you can't pull your elbows up. We have new regulations now. Everybody is going to have a front yard and a back year and a play area, and we think it is going to be an area you can be proud of. There will not be a house after a house and you can't tell the difference between the two of them. There won't be two alike in the same block. One might be built with wood, one brick, one with stone, one stone and brick, one stone and wood. It is going to be something different than the country has ever seen. We have been told by Atlanta if we work this right, we are going to have a housing project of 500 units, but it may be in fifty different spots, not in just in one spot. It is going to |
![]() |
| 31 | be wherever there is land available that now has
substandard housing. We may have one house itself on a block. We may
have three homes on another block by themselves with other houses
around them. But this is going to be public housing like no one in
Asheville or this area has ever seen. We will not be in competition
with any private real estate people because the only people eligible
to live in these homes will be those who are now in substandard
homes. The project investors will have all the land that they want
to to build their own homes on. People who live in our home will
have to come under certain stipulations, their income, and
where they now live. You are gong to see an age of new public
housing, and I think you all will be very proud of it. (Applause.) CHAIRMAN MILLER: Are there any other questions anyone would like to ask or any information you would like to have? Mr. Greer, it looks like you have done it well. W.C. ALLEN: My name is W.C. Allen. 350 Southside is the address I am representing. My question is, is it a fact that this meeting or these people in this meeting tonight would like to know whether or no the people living in this area would like to have the services which are being offered? |
![]() |
| 32 | Is that a fact is what we would like to know
tonight. CHAIRMAN MILLER : Yes, sir. We want to know. W.C. ALLEN: Now, we might stay here all night and wait on each other, each person to ask questions and we still wouldn't have, perhaps, what you would want. For me, I think by and large like a numbers of others who have the opinion and said they would like to have it. I would like to make a motion that we do accept this as has been offered by the East Riverside Urban Renewal. FROM THE FLOOR: I second the motion. CHAIRMAN MILLER: Mr. Attorney, this is in order, I presume? You have heard the motion and a second. Is there any discussion on the motion? FROM THE FLOOR: I want to know one thing. These houses you all are talking about, they are all for rent it seems to me, and I am not in to rent. I am going to be frank with you, I am not in to rent, because I want to save money. Somebody coming to get my rent, I don't like that, to be frank with you. I got my own right now and I ain't in for no renting. CHAIRMAN MILLER: We have a motion before the house now and I don't believe this is on the motion, but I will come back to you though and have your question |
![]() |
| 33 | answered. Are you ready for the question? FROM THE FLOOR: The question. CHAIRMAN MILLER: All those in favor, please say aye. FROM THE FLOOR: Aye. CHAIRMAN MILLER: Opposed likewise. FROM THE FLOOR: Nay. CHAIRMAN MILLER: All right. Now you may answer the question, Mr. Greer. MR. GREER: May I have your name and address, please ma'am, just to get it on the record? MRS. ROY ROGERS: My name is Mrs. Roy Rogers. 11 Blanton Street. MR. GREER: Mrs. Roy Rogers, 11 Blanton Street? MRS. ROY ROGERS: That's right. MR. GREER: Mrs. Rogers, I can sympathize with you greatly for I don't believe in renting either. As to the houses that will be built other than rental houses, we have areas within the redevelopment project that are to be sold for people who want to build a house or that we can sell -- as I said earlier, we don't build any kind of buildings. We will sell the land. You can build a house on it of any type and style you like and have no restrictions of square footage or price, and there |
![]() |
| 34 | will be builders in the area who will want to buy
land and put up a house that you might want to buy from them. There
will be ample opportunity for anyone who wants to buy or own a home
to do so in the East Riverside area. And in addition to that, for
those of you that might desire to live outside the area, the
Redevelopment Commission has a full-time professional staff who does
nothing but assist people in finding a place to live, whether it be
one to rent or one to buy. We have several people working at this,
as I say, full time. They are experienced in this. They know all the
realtors and know where everything is for sale in the whole City of
Asheville. We keep a list of it daily. We will, certainly, if we
cannot find you a place to live within the redevelopment area, if
you want some place else to live, we will certainly be glad to help.
This is a legal requirement that we do so, and we certainly will
give you all the assistance that we can. MRS. ROY ROGERS: I already have one. CHAIRMAN MILLER: If there are no further questions, we will stand and adjourned. FROM THE FLOOR: I would like to ask a question. MR. GREER: Will you come up to the mike, please? |
![]() |
| 35 | CHAIRMAN MILLER: Ladies and
gentlemen, we do have a question on the floor here. This lady wants
some information. MRS. HARRY THOMPSON: I am Mrs. Harry Thompson. I live at 31 Silver Street. I would like to ask a question about receiving a letter stating the items I should do to my home to bring it up to standard that I would like to know what I should do with it. MR. GREER: The lady, ladies and gentlemen, the lady has asked a question about receiving a letter stating what she is supposed to do to her house to bring it up to the standard of the City of Asheville. Again, we have a special staff, Mr. LePore is an architect. He has worked for several years. He is assisted by Mr. Bill Roland. These gentlemen, one or both of them, will inspect your house upon request. If you don't request it, sooner or later they will be around knocking on your door and asking to inspect it. They will give you a complete list of what should be done to bring it up to the standard of the City of Asheville. This is professional advice. It is not the advice of somebody who doesn't know what they are talking about. These people know buildings. They will tell you approximately how much it will cost. The will assist you in getting a contract or a contractor to do the work. |
![]() |
| 36 | MRS. HARRY THOMPSON: Thank
you. FROM THE FLOOR: Mr. Chairman, could I say just a word? CHAIRMAN MILLER: Yes, sir. W.F. ALGARY: I am W.F. Algary, member of the City Council. 172 Wembly Road is my address. This project came about in an unusual sort of way. It is one of the largest land area projects that the FHA has yet tackled, and probably one of the worst problems they have ever had. I was in a meeting in Detroit a couple of years ago and this thing was being discussed very accurately and the Area Manager from Atlanta frankly told me that he didn't think Asheville could handle it, is was too big a problem. Well, after about an hour of selling, he did change his mind, and tonight we are on the threshold of the fulfillment of this project. Mrs. Pickard, I think, has put her finger on a lot of the problems. A home is not simply a lot of land, some sticks and stones. It is more than that, and I envision the area and the day that will be in the not too distant future if the City of Asheville will accept the bond issue, that this thing in a material way will come to pass, but tonight is a good night to start thinking and tomorrow is a good day to start working towards determining when this does come to pass that the people in |
![]() |
| 37 | the area will be proud of it, will make it a showplace in Asheville. It is entirely possible. I have heard a great many people say great criticism about these things, that people pour millions of dollars into them and people move in to them, they tear up the houses and they disregard the parks and the shrubbery and the flowers, and so forth. I know this is going to be different, and I hope to see that when this is even started that community areas will be developed, such as the Agricultural Community Council, and you will have various areas that will be vying with one another to see who can make their area the most attractive area in the City, not just in this particular area, but the most attractive area in the City of Asheville. Now, that is something for us to really shoot for, to make worth all the -- really worthwhile all the effort and all the money and all the time that will have been put in to this project. We can go down there and move people in after putting ten million, twenty million, fifty million in this project, but somebody doesn't give it loving care, it really isn't worth the effort. Now, you people have the opportunity to prove to yourselves, to the city of Asheville and the State of North Carolina, that you can really make this project worthwhile and it will be one where anyone, regardless of race, creed, or color, will be damn |
![]() |
| 38 | glad to live. Thank you. (Applause.) MRS. GLOVER (?) : My name is Mrs. Glover (?). I live at 49 Hammet (?) Street. This does not concern me, but I am speaking for the people here who haven't asked about rent. Now, in the projects that they have, every time the man gets a raise, the rent goes up, and they pay exorbitant prices for Lee Walker Heights facilities, and they have families, and going up with the rent -- you know what the food is doing. I think they would want to know just what rent they would have to pay in these new houses. MR. GREER: That, of course, is a question which the Redevelopment Commission is not able to answer. The Administrator and the Board of the Housing Authority can best answer that. I believe I can say without fear of contradiction that the rent is charged in all public housing areas and in this public housing area to be built, is approximately twenty or twenty-five per cent below what a family would have to pay for the same accommodations outside the housing project, bearing in mind that you are getting the utilities and getting decent, safe, sanitary homes. Perhaps you need more clarification from the Director or from the Chairman. I would like to point out, if I may digress from that, prior to the meeting we have some booklets over here |
![]() |
| 39 | concerning the East Riverside Project, and certainly
would be happy if you would take on of these with you. It does
contain some information. Thank you. CHAIRMAN MILLER: Any other questions or comments? Someone back here? FROM THE FLOOR: I wonder if I might stand back here where I am? CHAIRMAN MILLER: All right. It is a little hard for me to hear you out there. FROM THE FLOOR: Mr. Greer and his staff and the Urban Renewal staff, I just wanted to take time out to express our appreciation for the very fine way and thought and consideration that has been given to this program through Mr. Greer, and having to make a choice of some of the very fine people I feel that we have here in the City down at 86 Livingston Street. Being one of the area chairmen and having tried to walk the wall that I felt my own humble way for this particular program, I feel it would be robbery if we did not give our appreciativeness for those persons in the office for the educational program that is now in action, and I feel that unless we offer our appreciation to Mr. LePore, Mrs. Grayson, Miss Littlejohn, and Mr. Roland, this particular part of the program so far would be incomplete. As one of the area chairmen |
![]() |
| 40 | and as a minister in the area, I want to thank you
and I want to ask the people of the area and the people of Asheville
that we cooperate in a most humble and sincere and progressive way
that we might accept this program that Asheville might be totally
proud of itself. (Applause.) CHAIRMAN MILLER: Thank you, very much. I am sure that the staff and those who work so hard appreciate your remarks. Anyone else have anything to say at this time; any questions or comments to make? If not, I will declare the meeting adjourned. ---------------------( Meeting adjourned at 8:40 P.M.)------------------------ |
![]() |
| 41 |
North Carolina Buncombe County I, Awa N. Edney, Court Reporter and Notary Public, do hereby certify that the foregoing forty pages is a true record of the public hearing on the East Riverside Urban Renewal Project given by the Asheville Redevelopment Commission, on Tuesday, May 31, 1966, at 7:30 P.M., in Room 409 of the Buncombe County Courthouse, Asheville, North Carolina, and reported by me. Witness my hand and seal, this the 8th day of June, 1966.
_____________________________ My commission expires: Awa N. Edney |
![]() |
| HOME | ||