| REPORT:
We were met by Ekaterina (?), Electronic Resources Coordinator, who
explained that St. Petersburg was the “cultural capital” of Russia.
The Scientific Library has a project with Stanford University on
issues relating to the e-university. Andres Kolm, IT Specialist,
was introduced. Ekaterina described the Russian electronic library
consortium that negotiates licenses for all 400 library members.
Sometimes resources are provided free because of support by
foundations. University libraries make up 40% of the members. They
subscribe only to the biggest resources and work with special
groups. Many resources are in English and they tell their faculty,
researchers, and students that they must learn English because they
will have to read and write in English to be published in the major
scientific journals.
Acting Director Marina Karpova welcomed us to
the Scientific Library. She told us that last year they had hosted
a group of public librarians from Texas. Ms. Karpova did a brief
presentation on the history of the university and the Scientific
Library of St. Petersburg State University, which is celebrating its
224th anniversary in December. It was founded in 1724 by
Peter the Great. The history of the university has always been
connected to the history of higher education in Russia. In 1783,
Catherine the Great presented the first Teachers Seminary collection
of 110 volumes to the university which served as the core of the
library collection. In 1819 the Library was formally established.
The staff are extremely proud that the library continued to serve
users during the siege of St. Petersburg during World War II,
despite the shortage of staff. She provided a statistical summary
of the collections, users, staff, and the department libraries
housed in the subject departments. Funding is insufficient so
department libraries began to develop. The staff are part of the
Scientific Library but the libraries are supported by the
disciplines and by fees. The department libraries vary greatly but
the Central Library sets common standards for all department
libraries.
In 2005 the Central Library issued an order
that no department libraries could continue using a card catalog.
Now they are all electronic. The development of technology has
helped with the lack of space for collections and with reading
rooms. The most exciting development was the scanning of the
Russian catalog, particularly relevant for Russian editions. They
are currently working on scanning foreign editions now. Three
million images have now been scanned, mainly cards from the catalog.
Future plans include renovating a building to
house the Library. It is a state-funded project and has been slow
to develop. One building is almost ready to house their rare books
and manuscripts collections and the research and development
department, where they do restoration of materials and create
digital copies to make available to others. An English language
version of their catalog is under development.
Ekatarina explained the goal now is to access
information, not just the books on the shelf. They are first in
usage statistics in the consortium. They own/subscribe to 80% of
the most important scientific information in the world. They have
30,000 e-journals including Ebsco, Springer, Wiley, JSTOR. They are
also beginning to work with Elsevier e-books and full-text databases
such as Scopus, CSA Illumina, and Journal Citation Reports (Web of
Science). They are one of the 57 most innovative universities in
Russia. Most important is information and storage. The librarians
have to go to the researchers to train them how to use these new
resources but English is a big barrier for them. Now there are some
Russian databases being developed. All licenses are university-wide
and are coordinated by the Central Scientific Library, which
promotes e-resources. Because of lack of funding in the 1990’s, the
Library was unable to subscribe to English language resources. To
receive adequate funding the Library argued that, in order for their
researchers to create new science, they needed access to the newest
science literature. Ms. Karpova stressed the importance of library
contacts.
They are currently working on a new digital
project on 18th Century Russian literature that was in
the collection of the Censorship Committee. These are copies of
materials that were reviewed by the Committee and not released to
the public, so the Committee retained the only copy of the item.
These were formerly in storage and are now being made available to
the public electronically.
Bede Mitchell did a presentation on “The
Automated Retrieval System: Inexpensive and Efficient Library
Storage.” This system has been installed in his library at Georgia
Southern University and provides 80 years of growth space for their
collection. They were very interested in this as a potential space
solution for their new building. The cost was 1/4 to 1/3 of that
for a new building. They also appreciated Bede’s effort to have the
presentation translated into Russian.
Kate Gordon introduced the topic of challenges
faced by library administrators by naming three challenges faced by
directors in the U.S.: providing new services without new staff; new
skills needed to maintain new services; and insufficient library
budgets to do everything we need to do. Ms. Karpova noted her
biggest challenges are small salaries for staff; she has
difficulties recruiting new librarians, although technology helps
attract some younger people to the profession. Her main goal is to
provide the library with properly trained staff. The only
professional training department is at the University for Culture
and Arts. They now promote librarianship as information management
to attract new people. Funding is still a problem. The University
is active in supporting librarians. The attitude towards
universities and higher education is changing as is the attitude
towards librarians within the university. The University supports
the Central Library but sometimes department libraries have more
support. |