The State Land Office and Land Grants

As the new prime holder of all land the state, in the years following the Revolutionary War, found it imperative to establish procedures by which settlers could acquire grants. The General Assembly directed the Justices of the Peace in each county to elect a clerk to receive entries and a surveyor. It decreed:

     "It shall be unlawful for any citizen to take up a claim for any lands which have not been granted by the Crown of Great Britain, or the Lords Proprietors of Carolina before the Fourth day of July, 1776, or which have accrued or shall accrue to this State by Treaty of Conquest...Provided that no Person shall be entitled to claim any greater quantity of land than six hundred forty acres where the survey shall be bounded in any part by vacant lands, or more than one thousand acres between the lines of lands already surveyed and laid out for any other person.
     ...every person shall pay into the hands of the entry taker Two Pounds ten shillings for every Hundred acres, together with the fees...
    ... Provided that any person claiming six hundred forty acres for himself and one hundred acres for his wife and each of his children shall pay 5 pounds for every one hundred acres exceeding six hundred forty acres."

The Assembly directed the entry taker to place each application for land in a record book. If no other claimant appeared within three months, a warrant would be issued to the surveyor. Counter claims would be settled by the County Court. Persons possessing lands applied for at the old Public Land Office of the Crown, or from the Earl of Granville, for which patents had not been issued, would receive priority.

When a surveyor received a warrant, he located the boundaries with the aid of the claimants by placing conspicuous marks on prominent trees. Then he took note of distinctive geographic features, made two plats of his survey, filed one plat with the warrant ant submitted the other for attachment to the patent. Patents were authenticated by the governor, counter-signed by the Secretary of State, and issued semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The grantee then had one year in which to register his grant at the County Courthouse. If he did not do so, it became void. This procedure, except for minor changes, continued until 1960, at which time the Secretary of State transferred certain responsibilities to the Department of Administration.

In 1779 the Assembly amended the land office act for the benefit of people who had settled in the Granville District. It decreed:

"If it shall appear that any Person hath seated himself on Lands within the Bounds of any former Entry of Survey, and for which no Grant was ever obtained, and hath improved and continued in peaceful possession of the same...for seven Years, without interruption by or from the person claiming or Declaration of Rights to the Person so possessed under such Entry, or Survey, in such case, the person claiming under such former entry or survey, shall be forever barred of his right of entry of the Land in Question, and the preference shall be given to him who settled on, and continued in peaceable possession of the same..."

By this action the legislature reaffirmed the possession act of 1715, chapter 27. The seven-year period only applied in claims against other private parties. In claims against the State, uncontested possessions for at least twenty years had to be shown.

The demand for land continued until 1780. By then paper currency had become unduly inflated. The legislature attempted to relieve the situation by making a portion of each soldier's bonus payable in land. Then in 1783 the General Assembly tied its currency and land problems together. It made all public land, except the military reserve, security for a new issue of currency at the rate of 100 acres for each ten pounds.

Next page: Sample Survey

Bibliography:

Pomeroy, Kenneth B. and James G. Yoho. North Carolina Lands: Ownership, Use, and Management of Forest and Related Lands. Washington, D.C.: The American Forestry Association, 1964, pp. 76-77.